Welcome to FIS   Sponsored By
United States
Subscribe to FIS | Register with FIS | Advertise with FIS | Newsletter | About FIS | Contact us
Richard Telofski

Richard Telofski is a competitive strategy analyst at The Kahuna Institute, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey USA, where he specializes in critical and independent analysis of anti-corporate activists and how they impact business.

He is the author of four books, the latest of which is Insidious Competition – The Battle for Meaning and the Corporate Image, dealing in-depth with the business effects of NGOs and activist groups.

Previous to his work at the Institute, Richard was a professor of economics and marketing at Monmouth University and at Georgian Court University.

He holds a B.A. in Communications & Sociology from Rutgers University, and a M.B.A. in Marketing from Rider University.

Richard blogs regularly about the impact of activism upon business. His work can be read at www.Telofski.com.


Of Greenpeace, Democracy, and Fishing
Saturday, November 12, 2011

There can't be much doubt that Greenpeace has become a significant factor in the seafood industry over the past few years. Positioning themselves as fishing experts, this environmental non-governmental organization (eNGO) leads protest actions against various seafood brands, acting on an agenda which they present as being in the public interest. But who selected this agenda? Is their agenda one created from a wide base of opinion or is it one that is created by a selected few? Before we answer these questions, let's first take a look at some examples of this agenda's effects on the seafood industry.

Every few years, Greenpeace produces its Tinned Tuna League Table. The most recent table was published in January 2011 rating various tuna brands on their level of sustainability fishing practices. These ratings are based on criteria that Greenpeace selects itself. Greenpeace publicizes the table widely, eliciting a variety of comment from brands, retailers, and consumers alike. The publication of this table is supplemented by the release of other “responsible” seafood ranking guides, among them the 2010 guide published in Japan. These guides are based on Greenpeace selected criteria, as well.

In addition to the tables and guides, Greenpeace launches “corporate campaigns,” selecting a targeted seafood brand they consider not sustainable enough. Recently the industry saw the Sealord brand in Auckland NZ categorized as “bad tuna;” positioned by Greenpeace as one that is caught “unsustainably.” Of course, the definition of “sustainable” is not set in stone and Greenpeace leveraged that fuzzy definition when they festooned some of Auckland's streets with anti-Sealord banners and posters, generally making a mess. Sealord responded by saying that the eNGO's campaign was “misleading in the extreme” while the local business association characterized the poster plastering as “tantamount to vandalism.”

Choosing to concentrate on demagoguery rather than constructive action, Greenpeace has been cited as not wanting to work with industry groups toward the improvement of tuna fishing techniques, and has been shown to choose to spend its time promoting “erroneous stories”, demanding an end to industrial fleet fishing and the Mediterranean bluefin fishery, as well as issuing self-defined studies condemning various national seafood retailers and industries.

There are many other examples, but the point is made that this eNGO has significant influence within and on the seafood industry. Now back to the central question: how widely selected is the agenda that Greenpeace enacts?

Greenpeace is operated as a semi-loose federation of national/regional offices. Greenpeace International oversees each office's activities with particular attention to approving campaigns such as the those described above. Each office is governed by a board of directors which is elected by a Greenpeace membership of volunteers, staff, or other activists who have shown commitment to the causes of this eNGO. It is the representatives from the individual offices (presumably the members of the board of directors from each national office) who elect the Greenpeace International board of directors. This sounds alright so far, I suppose. But let's dig a little deeper. Who elects the members of the national offices? The process for these elections, using the Greenpeace United States office as an example, is described below and is thought to be the similar for each national Greenpeace office.

Greenpeace US is a very tightly held organization, with a voting process that is just as tightly and closely controlled by a limited and carefully selected number of people. Let me explain.

In Section 2.1a of Greenpeace US's Bylaws, “Selection of Voting Members,” it states:

"The Voting Members of this corporation (referred to in these Bylaws as the “members”) shall consist of those individuals designated by the Board of Directors."

In Section 2.1, the Bylaws further state that Voting Members will be selected based on their work experience with Greenpeace US, or other Greenpeace divisions, or on their leadership in the environmental movement, and that the total number of members will be between 40 and 100.

So far what we see is an extremely narrow voting base chosen by the Board of Directors. And now, here's where the tight control comes in.

Section 2.3 of those same bylaws, “Rights of Voting Members,” says in sub-section A that Voting Members, among other “rights and privileges,” have:

"The right to vote for member-elected directors of the corporation (Greenpeace US) as provided in these Bylaws." (Parentheses mine.)

So, here we see that the Board of Directors select the Voting Members and the Voting Members select, at least some of, the directors on the board. And these narrowly-based opinions and less-than-democratic influences pass through to the international organization and the campaigns it approves.

Such a governance policy, lacking in wide democracy, provides for little openness, not much accountability, and sets up a situation where transparency can become nonexistent. All of this makes for a situation where democracy is forgotten and the power of this worldwide eNGO is concentrated in the hands of a relatively small number of people.

We can see now that the answer to the questions posed in my first paragraph is that relatively few people create an agenda that has a disproportional effect on the seafood industry. Because of this absence of wide democracy in Greenpeace's agenda, an agenda that consequently becomes stoked on fear and sensationalism, the rest of us lack certainty that their ideas are representative of the general population.

Now, as so often happens, the answer to one question breeds yet another question.

The question now is not whether the Greenpeace agenda is determined by a selected few.

The question now is what do we do with this information?

I'll leave the answer to that one to ALL of you.

 Email Print

Andres Loubet Jambert
Chairman and Co-Founder of FIS

Milko Schvartzman
Reply to the Falklands Islands Government about slavery and overfishing occurrences under its support and connivance

Read article
John  Barton
Falkland Islands Government's Reply to Milko Schvartzman

Read article
Milko Schvartzman
The tragedy of the South West Atlantic. Slavery and overfishing.

Read article
Daniel Gilardoni
Is the Fishing Industry the Biggest Loser in the South-East Atlantic Conflict?

Read article
Andres Loubet Jambert
The Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) & Southwest Atlantic Fisheries

Read article
John  Barton
FIS Response: The Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) & Southwest Atlantic Fisheries

Read article
Andres Loubet Jambert
Falkland Islands (Malvinas): Argentina strengthens management. What could be improved?

Read article
Adam Soliman
Seafood Markets and their Potential

Read article
Paul Williams
Was it just me or was the first edition of Hugh's new Fish Fight series slightly … weird?

Read article
Phil Cruver
The “Next Big Thing”: The Sequenced Oyster Gene

Read article

Greenpeace urges Thai Union to stop alleged labour abuse
Thailand Greenpeace has urged Thai Union to increase oversight, traceability and transparency at sea after alleged connections of the Thai firm to alleged forced labour, human rights abuses and environmental devastation.
Maldives fisheries minister receives IPNLF Award
Thailand Minister of Fisheries and Agriculture for the Maldives has been presented with the International Pole & Line Foundation Award that recognises Inspiration and Collaboration in the pole-and-line and handline sector.
Indonesia and Australia join efforts to combat illegal fishing
Australia Indonesian and Australian authorities have signed an agreement to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing and to promote sustainable fisheries governance across the region.
Over 297,000 sq km marine park created
Chile A new marine protected area is added to the seven existing ones in the country, as it was announced by the president of Chile.
Maruha Nichiro Corporation
Nichirei Corporation -Headquarter-
Pesquera El Golfo S.A.
Ventisqueros - Productos del Mar Ventisqueros S.A
Wärtsilä Corporation -Wartsila Group Headquarter-
ITOCHU Corporation -Headquarter-
BAADER - Nordischer Maschinenbau Rud. Baader GmbH (Head Office)
Inmarsat plc - Global Headquarters
Marks & Spencer
Tesco PLC (Supermarket) - Headquarters
Pescanova, S.A. - Group Headquarters
Sea Harvest Corporation (PTY) Ltd.
I&J - Irvin & Johnson Limited
Blue Continent Products (Pty) Ltd - (Oceana Group Limited)
Pesquera San Jose S.A.
Nutreco N.V. - Head Office
CNFC China National Fisheries Corporation - Group Headquarters
W. van der Zwan & Zn. B.V.
SMMI - Sunderland Marine Mutual Insurance Co., Ltd. - Headquarters
Icicle Seafoods Inc. -Headquarter-
Starkist Seafood Co. - Headquearters
Trident Seafoods Corp.
American Seafoods Group LLC - Head Office
Marel ehf - Group Headquarters
SalMar ASA - Group Headquarters
Sajo Industries Co., Ltd
Hansung Enterprise Co.,Ltd.
BIM - Irish Sea Fisheries Board (An Bord Iascaigh Mhara)
CEFAS - Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science
COPEINCA ASA - Corporacion Pesquera Inca S.A.C.
Chun Cheng Fishery Enterprise Pte Ltd.
Food Project (Siam) Co., Ltd.
VASEP - Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters & Producers
Gomes da Costa
Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. (Headquarters)
NISSUI - Nippon Suisan Kaisha, Ltd. - Group Headquarters
FAO -Food and Agriculture Organization- Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Headquarter)
Hagoromo Foods Co., Ltd.
Koden Electronics Co., Ltd. (Headquarters)
A.P. Møller - Maersk A/S - Headquarters
BVQI - Bureau Veritas Quality International (Head Office)
UPS - United Parcel Service, Inc. - Headquarters
Hamburg Süd Group - (Headquearters)
Armadora Pereira S.A. - Group Headquarters
NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Headquarters)
Omega Protein Corporation -Headquarter-
Marona S.A.
Marine Harvest ASA - Headquarters
Marubeni Europe Plc -UK-
Findus Ltd
Icom Inc. (Headquarter)
WWF Centroamerica
Oceana Group Limited
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Ajinomoto Co., Inc. -Headquarter-
Friosur S.A. - Headquarters
Cargill, Incorporated - Global Headquarters
Benihana Inc.
Leardini Pescados Ltda
Mitsubishi Corporation Marine Products Depts. D.Team
CJ Corporation  -Holding Headquarter-
Greenpeace International - The Netherlands
David Suzuki Foundation
Fisheries and Oceans Canada -Communications Branch-
Mitsui & Co.,Ltd - Headquarters
Ocean Trawlers Group - Ocean Trawlers HK Ltd.
Natori Co., Ltd.
Carrefour Supermarket - Headquarters
FedEx Corporation -Headquarter-
AKBM - Aker BioMarine ASA
Seafood Choices Alliance -Headquarter-
Austevoll Seafood ASA
Walmart / Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Supermarket) -Headquarter-
New Japan Radio Co.Ltd (JRC) -Head Office-
Gulfstream JSC
INVE Group - Head Office
Marine Stewardship Council - MSC Worldwide Headquarters
Royal Dutch Shell plc (Headquarter)
Genki Sushi Co.,Ltd -Headquarter-
Iceland Pelagic ehf
AXA Assistance Argentina S.A.
Caterpillar Inc. - Headquarters
Tiger Brands Limited
Morpol ASA - Group Headquarters
National Geographic Society
AmazonFresh, LLC - AmazonFresh

Copyright 1995 - 2015 Fish Info & Services Co.Ltd| All Rights Reserved.   DISCLAIMER